50+
Response Collected
This psychology project examines the interconnectedness of
sleep, stress, and academic performance in student life. By
investigating the direct links between sleep quality, stress
levels, and academic outcomes, our goal is to uncover
practical strategies for students to enhance their well-being.
The study focuses on 45 participants aged 17 to 28, utilizing
the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) to assess various
components of sleep quality. As sleep significantly impacts
overall health and cognitive function, understanding the sleep
patterns of young adults is crucial. Through survey analysis,
we aim to provide insights into factors influencing sleep
quality and their implications for well-being and daily
functioning.
By doing so, we hope to not only uncover practical solutions
for students but also contribute to a deeper understanding of
the broader implications for their overall well-being and
daily functioning. In essence, this project serves as a
gateway to unraveling the complexities of sleep, stress, and
academic performance in the dynamic landscape of student life.
Response Collected
Most respondents (65%) rated their sleep as "Very Good" or "Fairly Good," reflecting a positive perception. However, a substantial portion (33%) reported "Fairly Bad" or "Very Bad" sleep, indicating diverse experiences within the surveyed population and underlining the subjective nature of sleep quality assessments.
Most respondents (38.6%) fell asleep within 15 minutes, suggesting a quick transition to sleep. However, 51% experienced longer sleep onset times, with 36.4% taking 15 to 30 minutes and 25% needing over 30 minutes. This pattern indicates potential issues with sleep initiation, possibly linked to factors like stress, anxiety, or other sleep-disrupting influences.
A significant 63.6% of respondents reported insufficient sleep, with 54.6% getting less than 5 hours and an additional 9% between 5 to 7 hours. Only 36.4% reported meeting the recommended 7 hours or more. This prevalent pattern highlights a concerning trend of insufficient sleep among university students, potentially affecting their well-being, academic performance, and mental health.
56% of respondents reported high habitual sleep efficiency exceeding 85%. Yet, a significant proportion reported lower efficiency: 21% in the 75-84% range, 18% in the 65-74% range, and 5% with less than 65% efficiency. This diversity in results suggests varying sleep efficiency levels among the surveyed population, with a notable percentage experiencing less optimal sleep efficiency.
A significant 59% of respondents reported lacking a defined sleep schedule, indicating inconsistency in bedtime routines. In contrast, 18% maintained a consistent sleep schedule, while 22% adhered to it only on weekdays. These findings highlight a prevalent trend of irregular sleep schedules among participants, potentially contributing to variations in sleep quality and overall well-being.
The data on sleep medication usage reveals a strong preference for non-pharmaceutical sleep management, as 84% reported never using sleep medication. A small percentage reported rare usage (9%), occasional usage (4.5%), and only 2.2% reported frequent reliance on sleep medication. These findings emphasize a prevailing trend of infrequent use of sleep medication within the surveyed population.
A noteworthy 68% reported being highly or moderately affected by sleep-related issues during the day, signaling challenges in daily functioning. Meanwhile, 30% experienced a marginal impact, and only a small percentage (2.2%) reported no impact at all. This suggests that a majority of the students face difficulties staying alert and finding motivation during the day.
0-5: Good sleep quality
6-10: Poor sleep quality - consider consulting with a sleep specialist
11 to 15: Poor sleep quality (moderate sleep disturbances)
16 to 21: Poor sleep quality (severe sleep disturbances)